DynaMesh®-SIS direct
DynaMesh®-SIS direct soft
DynaMesh®-SIS direct visible
For the surgical treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence
Transobturatoric position of the tape, in “outside-in” technique.
Outstanding shape stability, defined elasticity, high effective porosity and atraumatic selvedges [21].
Transobturator (outside-in)
DynaMesh®-SIS direct
DynaMesh®-SIS direct soft
with SOFT structure
DynaMesh®-SIS direct visible
with SOFT structure
+ visible on MRI
| DynaMesh®-SIS direct (1) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV211050F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS direct (1) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV211050F3 | Unit = 3 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS direct soft (2) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV411050F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS direct soft (2) | 01 cm x 50 cm | PV411050F3 | Unit = 3 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS direct visible (3) | 01 cm x 50 cm | PV471050F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS direct visible (3) | 01 cm x 50 cm | PV471050F3 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
Literature: Female Urinary Incontinence
Contents 1. Polymer PVDF as Implant Material 2. Product Design – Essential Mesh Parameters 3. DynaMesh® visible Technology 4. Female Urinary Incontinence 1. Polymer PVDF as Implant Material 1. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP, et al (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23:3487–3493 2. Klink CD, Junge […]
| Product | DynaMesh®-SIS direct (1)
DynaMesh®-SIS direct soft (2) DynaMesh®-SIS direct (3) |
| Field of application | stress urinary incontinence (SUI) / mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) |
| Surgical method | transvaginal / transobturator |
| Fixation | none |
| Optimal handling |
 |
| Optimal patient safety |
|
| Optimal patient comfort |
|
| Atraumatic selvedges |
|
| No curling up |
|
| Shape stability |
|
| Defined elasticity |
|
| visible technology |
 (1,2) / (3) |
Applies to all product sizes
Does not apply
| Product | DynaMesh®-SIS direct (1)
DynaMesh®-SIS direct soft (2) DynaMesh®-SIS direct (3) |
| Polymer (Monofilament) | PVDF |
| Excellent biocompatibility |
|
| Minimal foreign body reaction |
|
| Reduced bacterial adherence |
|
| High ageing resistance |
|
| Optimal dynamometry |
|
| Reactive surface (a) [m²/m²] | 2.8 (1)
2.2 (2,3) |
| Maximum stability (b) [N/cm] | 117 (1)
76 (2,3) |
| Elasticity (b) at 16 N/cm [%] | 6 (1)
9 (2,3) |
| Textile porosity (c) [%] | 63 (1)
70 (2,3) |
| Effective porosity (c) [%]] | 57 (1)
67 (2,3) |
| Effective porosity at 2.5/16 N/cm(c) [%] | 57/59 (1)
67/68 (2,3) |
| Classification (d) | 1a |
Applies to all product sizes
Legends for the technical data
(a) Ratio of implant reactive surface area (thread surface) to implant surface area (b) measured in the strip tensile test (c) Mühl method [6] (d) Klinge’s classification [8]
