DynaMesh®-SIS
DynaMesh®-SIS soft
DynaMesh®-SIS visible
For the surgical treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence
Retropubic and transobturatoric position of the tape in “inside-out” and “outside-out” technique.
Outstanding shape stability, defined elasticity, high effective porosity and atraumatic selvedges [21].
Retropubic (inside-out)
Transobturator (outside-in)
DynaMesh®-SIS
DynaMesh®-SIS soft
with SOFT structure
DynaMesh®-SIS visible
with SOFT structure
+ visible on MRI
| DynaMesh®-SIS (1) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV211056F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS (1) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV211056F3 | Unit = 3 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS soft (2) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV411056F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS soft (2) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV411056F3 | Unit = 3 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS visible (3) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV471056F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-SIS visible (3) |
01 cm x 50 cm | PV471056F3 | Unit = 3 EA / BX |
Literature: Female Urinary Incontinence
Contents 1. Polymer PVDF as Implant Material 2. Product Design – Essential Mesh Parameters 3. DynaMesh® visible Technology 4. Female Urinary Incontinence 1. Polymer PVDF as Implant Material 1. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP, et al (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23:3487–3493 2. Klink CD, Junge […]
| Product | DynaMesh®-SIS (1)
DynaMesh®-SIS soft (2) DynaMesh®-SIS visible (3) |
| Field of application | stress urinary incontinence (SUI) / mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) |
| Surgical method | transvaginal / retropubic / transobturator |
| Fixation | none |
| Optimal handling |
 |
| Optimal patient safety |
|
| Optimal patient comfort |
|
| Atraumatic selvedges |
|
| No curling up |
|
| Shape stability |
|
| Defined elasticity |
|
| visible technology |
 (1,2) / (3) |
Applies to all product sizes
Does not apply
| Product | DynaMesh®-SIS (1)
DynaMesh®-SIS soft (2) DynaMesh®-SIS visible (3) |
| Polymer (Monofilament) | PVDF |
| Excellent biocompatibility |
|
| Minimal foreign body reaction |
|
| Reduced bacterial adherence |
|
| High ageing resistance |
|
| Optimal dynamometry |
|
| Reactive surface (a) [m²/m²] | 2.8 (1)
2.2 (2,3) |
| Maximum stability (b) [N/cm] | 117 (1)
76 (2,3) |
| Elasticity (b) at 16 N/cm [%] | 6 (1)
9 (2,3) |
| Textile porosity (c) [%] | 63 (1)
70 (2,3) |
| Effective porosity (c) [%]] | 57 (1)
67 (2,3) |
| Effective porosity at 2.5/16 N/cm(c) [%] | 57/59 (1)
67/68 (2,3) |
| Classification (d) | 1a |
Applies to all product sizes
Legends for the technical data
(a) Ratio of implant reactive surface area (thread surface) to implant surface area (b) measured in the strip tensile test (c) Mühl method [6] (d) Klinge’s classification [8]
